May God in the Eucharistic celebration of today bestow on you the grace to recognize the power of Jesus working in the Church and in the world and grant you by the same power the graces to fulfill God’s will always in your life as Jesus did. Happy Sunday! +John I. Okoye
.
DOCTRINE AND FAITH
(Genesis 3,9-15 ; 2 Cor 4,13-5,1: Mark 3,20-35: 10th Sunday of Year B, 2018)
This gospel reading contains an example of intercalation, a distinctive characteristic of Mark’s Gospel, where one narrative is sandwiched within another. Here, a report of a hostile encounter with scribes from Jerusalem (vv. 22-30) is found within one that is about the arrival and concern of members of Jesus’ family (vv. 20-21, 31-35). Though very distinct stories, when placed together, as they are here, they interpret each other. The narrative states that Jesus came home, probably not to Nazareth, the place he grew up, but to Capernaum, the place he has now made his home. His relatives (later identified as his mother and his brothers, v. 31), have come to seize him, to take charge of him with force if need be. They believed that he was beside himself, out of his mind. Why they believed this was not stated. Most likely they have heard of the claims he has been making and of the wonders he has performed, and they might fear for his safety. Their concern betrays their lack of faith in the authenticity of these claims and in the origin of the wonders. The scribes also misunderstand Jesus, but it was not out of concern for him. They acknowledge that he has extraordinary power to cast out demons, but they ascribe this power to the prince of demons. They spoke of Beelzebul (Baal-zebul, or Lord of the temple), while Jesus spoke of Satan. Both were references to the same spirit of evil. Once again the challenge of the scribes was an attempt to shame Jesus (cf. Mark 2:23-28). Jesus counters their accusation with but two parables. He first pointed out the absurdity of their allegation, maintaining that neither a house nor a kingdom would be able to endure if either were divided against itself. Both would collapse from within. In order for the house or the kingdom to stand firm it would need internal coherence and stability. With a second image Jesus alludes to the ruin of a house when one stronger than the householder attacks and plunders the property. Before this pillage can be accomplished, the attacker has to incapacitate the householder, thereby, preventing any kind of resistance. This parable suggests that Jesus is indeed incapacitating the evil one and is bringing the house of evil to ruin. Jesus ends his riposte (a quick, clever reply to an insult or criticism) with a pronouncement that is dire in its consequences. To impute the power of the Holy Spirit that is at work in Jesus to the spirit of evil is an unforgivable blasphemy.
Attention was again directed to the family members of Jesus, who were outside, while Jesus was inside in the midst of a crowd. They have already demonstrated their misunderstanding of Jesus’ mission. Jesus now makes a daring statement about family ties. Upon being told that his mother and brothers and sisters were outside and asking for him, Jesus replied: Who are my mother and brothers? … Anyone who does the will of God, that person is my brother and sister and mother. In a society where familial bonds and obligations supersede all other responsibilities, Jesus claims that real kinship is determined by acceptance of the will of God, not by blood or marriage. Acceptance of God’s will and God’s marvellous deeds are the fundamental challenge in both of these stories.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c940/3c940ef9a38096b5537f85afcf4af2caf9cdabac" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d29bc/d29bc74a5982fdce610728c155e9c14a177b79c6" alt=""
graphics by chukwubike
No comments:
Post a Comment